Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

Publication Ethics

In Journal of Turkish Academic Novelty (tan)A number of ethical policies have been developed by the Editorial Board in order to ensure that published studies are unbiased and ethical. These policies cover authors, referees, editors and study-related processes.tanThe ethical duties and responsibilities included in the journal are published in open access and with the publication policies of nationally and internationally scanned journals.Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) It has been prepared taking into account the guides and policies published by.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
tanAuthor(s) who submit work to are expected to comply with the following ethical responsibilities:

The works submitted by the author(s) are expected to be original and up-to-date. Author(s) are required to fully and accurately cite and/or quote all studies they use.
Persons who do not contribute to the content of the study should not be listed as authors. Situations and relationships that may constitute a conflict of interest (if any) should be disclosed.
Raw data regarding their articles may be requested from the author(s) within the framework of the evaluation processes. Author(s) must submit the requested data and information to the publication and/or scientific committee.
If the author(s) notices a mistake or error regarding their published work, which is under evaluation, they have the obligation to inform the journal editor or publisher and to cooperate with the editor in correcting or withdrawing their work.
Authors cannot submit their works to the application process of more than one journal at the same time.
Work published in another journaldawnIt cannot be sent to .
A study submitted to another journal that has not yet been evaluateddawnIt cannot be sent to .
No action such as adding or removing authors or changing the order of authors can be requested for a study whose evaluation process has already begun.

Ethical Duties and Responsibilities of Editors

General duties and responsibilities

Editors,

To ensure the development of the journal nationally and internationally,
To manage processes aimed at improving the quality of published studies,
To carry out the implementation processes of ethical rules for all stakeholders of the journal,
To update publishing and ethical policies in order to contribute to the development of the journal,
They are responsible for editing the journal's website and keeping it updated.

Relations with the reader

Editors,

To take into account reader feedback regarding journal publishing, scope and ethics,
tan to develop the studies published in , taking into account the interests and needs of the reader,
It is obliged to answer questions from readers, provided that they remain within the framework of ethical rules.

Relations with authors

Editors versus writers;

Sending the studies sent to the journal to the publication board, which decides whether to send them to referees or not.
To inform authors about publication and ethical policies,
To prevent possible conflicts between authors and referees,
To ensure an unbiased evaluation by implementing the concept of "Blind Referee" in a healthy way,
To evaluate, with appropriate justifications, the requests of the authors stating that there is a conflict of interest among them and that their work should not be sent to these referees,
Responding positively to author requests to withdraw manuscripts that have not yet been accepted for review,
It is responsible for evaluating authors' objections to referee and editor decisions/reports and, if deemed appropriate, initiating a new evaluation process.

Relations with referees

Editors versus referees;

To determine a referee suitable for the subject of the candidate study,
To provide the information and guidance that referees need during the evaluation phase,
To consider whether there is a conflict of interest between authors and referees,
To keep information regarding the referee who made the evaluation confidential,
To encourage referees to be impartial,
Answering referees' questions about publication and ethical policies,
Making updates to improve the referee pool,
To remind referees about the evaluation period,
They are responsible for encouraging referees to evaluate in a constructive, courteous and appropriate manner.

Relations with the Editorial Board

Editors,

Meeting with the Editorial Board at regular intervals,
Board dawn to provide the information and guidance they need regarding 's publication and ethical policies,
Install when neededdawnTo provide training on 's publication and ethical policies,
To develop the magazine by taking into account the feedback from the board,
To ensure that board members are impartial,
To encourage the board to evaluate studies within the framework of scientific criteria,
Candidates are responsible for communicating with the relevant board member regarding the evaluation, depending on the subject of the study.

Relations with the International Advisory Board

The editor must ensure that all advisory board members carry out the processes in accordance with the publication policies and guidelines.
The advisory board should inform its members about publication policies and keep them informed of developments.
It should ensure that the members of the advisory board evaluate the studies impartially and independently.
The new board of advisors must identify members who can contribute and are suitably qualified.
Advisory board members should submit studies appropriate to their areas of expertise for evaluation.
Must interact regularly with the board of advisors.
Meetings should be held at regular intervals with the board of advisors for the development of publication policies and the journal.

Author Rights:

Writers),

They can designate referees whose work they wish not to be sent due to conflict of interest and/or ethical reasons.
They may withdraw their unpublished work while it is in the evaluation process.
They can withdraw their articles that are not included in the evaluation process. However, they cannot withdraw their manuscripts that have been sent for peer review/referee evaluation.
Due to material errors that occur during the printing process, they may request corrections (erratum) for problematic areas in the work to be published in the first issue or for information errors caused by them.

Ethical Responsibilities of Referees

tanStudies sent to are sent anonymously to at least two referees in the relevant field for evaluation. In referee evaluations, in case of equal positive and negative opinions about the article, the opinion of the editor or a third referee is taken.
tanIn , a double-blind peer review process is adopted, the author and the referee are unaware of each other's identity. In this contextdawnReviewers who evaluate studies are expected to have the following ethical responsibilities:

tanRead 's publishing policies
Agreeing to evaluate only studies related to the field of expertise. Not accepting evaluation just to have an idea about the subject of the article, even though it is not an area of expertise,
Refusing to make an evaluation when they realize that they cannot be impartial when making the evaluation,
Completing the evaluation process within a certain time frame,
To make evaluations within the framework of impartiality and confidentiality,
When faced with a situation such as a conflict of interest, refuse to make an evaluation and report this situation to the editor,
Notifying the editor when they detect that the article they are evaluating has been sent to another journal at the same time,
Making the evaluation constructively and kindly. Not making personal comments such as hostility, insults and slander,
Making sure that the evaluations are related to the content of the article. To be sensitive in ensuring that factors such as belief, sect, race, gender, political opinion do not affect the evaluation process.

tanArticles submitted for publication in must not have been published or submitted for publication in another journal. Papers previously presented at a congress - provided that the entire work has not been published in the congress book - and articles compiled from the graduate thesis should be stated at the end of the page with a footnote containing the necessary information. All responsibility for the published articles belongs to the author(s).

Authors are required to obtain "Ethics Committee Approval" for their work.

Journal Policy

Refereeing and Printing Processes

The studies that reach the journal are pre-examined by the Editorial Board in terms of compliance with the journal scope and writing rules. Studies deemed appropriate as a result of this review are submitted to the evaluation of at least two referees using the blind referee method. Referees are given 30 days to make an evaluation and a new referee is appointed to replace the referee who does not respond within this period. In order for the candidate study to be published in the journal, it must receive positive opinions from at least two referees. If one of the referees expresses a positive opinion and the other gives a negative opinion, the study is submitted to the opinion of a third referee. The author(s) are obliged to make corrections suggested by the referee(s) (if any) within 30 days. Articles that receive a publishable report from the referee(s) and are checked by the journal editorship enter the publication process. The final format of the articles is given by the author(s). Articles accepted for publicationEarly Appearance They are taken to the section. They are then published in an appropriate issue by the decision of the Editorial Board. No changes can be made to articles that have been finalized and taken into the publication process.

The referee(s) does not have information about the identity of the author(s), and the author(s) does not have information about the identity of the referee(s). The responsibility for ensuring confidentiality on this matter belongs to the journal editor.

Quality assurance

Editors; is responsible for the publication of every article published in the journal in accordance with the journal publication policies and international standards.

Protection of Personal Data

Editors; is responsible for ensuring the protection of personal data regarding the subjects or images included in the evaluated studies. Unless the explicit consent of the individuals used in the studies is documented, it is the duty to refuse the study. Also editors; is responsible for protecting the individual data of authors, referees and readers.

Ethics Committee, Human and Animal Rights

Editors; It is responsible for ensuring the protection of human and animal rights in the evaluated studies. Ethics committee approval regarding the subjects used in the studies is responsible for rejecting the study in cases where there is no permission for experimental research.

Precautions Against Possible Abuse and Misconduct

Editors; is obliged to take precautions against possible abuse and misconduct. In addition to conducting a meticulous and objective investigation to identify and evaluate complaints regarding this situation, sharing the relevant findings is among the editor's responsibilities.

Ensuring Academic Publication Integrity

Editors must ensure that errors, inconsistencies or misleading judgments in studies are quickly corrected.

Protection of Intellectual Property Rights

Editors; It is obliged to protect the intellectual property rights of all published articles and to defend the rights of the journal and the author(s) in case of possible violations.

In addition, editors are obliged to take the necessary precautions to ensure that the contents of all published articles do not violate the intellectual property rights of other publications.

Constructivism and Openness to Discussion

Editors; He/she should take into account convincing criticisms of the works published in the journal and display a constructive attitude towards these criticisms.

The author(s) of the criticized works should be given the right to reply.

One should not ignore or exclude studies with negative results.

Complaints

Editors; The author is obliged to carefully examine complaints from referees or readers and respond in an enlightening and explanatory manner.

Political and Commercial Concerns

The journal owner, publisher or any other political or commercial factor does not influence the editors' independent decision-making.

Conflicts of Interest

Editors; It ensures that the publication process of the studies is completed independently and impartially, taking into account conflicts of interest between the author(s), referees and other editors.

Ethical Responsibilities of Referees

Evaluation of all studies by "Blind Referee" directly affects the quality of publication. This process provides confidence through objective and independent evaluation of the publication.Tan, The evaluation process is carried out on the principle of double-blind refereeing. Referees cannot contact the authors directly, evaluations and comments are transmitted through the journal management system. In this process, evaluation forms and referee comments on full texts are forwarded to the author(s) through the editor. In this contextdawn Reviewers who evaluate studies are expected to have the following ethical responsibilities:

Only work related to the field of expertise should accept evaluation.
The evaluation must be impartial and confidential.
If he thinks that he is faced with a conflict of interest during the evaluation process, he should refuse to review the study and inform the journal editor.
In accordance with the principle of confidentiality, they must destroy the studies they have examined after the evaluation process. They may only use the final versions of the studies they review after they are published.
The evaluation should be made objectively only in relation to the content of the study. Nationality, gender, religious beliefs, political beliefs and commercial concerns should not be allowed to influence the evaluation.
The evaluation should be made in a constructive and polite manner. Must not make derogatory personal comments that include hostility, slander or insults.
They must carry out the work they have agreed to evaluate in a timely manner and with the above ethical responsibilities.

Ethical Responsibilities of the Publisher

Journal of Turkish Academic Novelty (tan)It protects the ownership and copyright of every article published in , and assumes the obligation to keep a record of every published copy.

Editors have the responsibility to take precautions against all kinds of scientific misconduct, citation fraud and plagiarism.

In Case You Encounter an Unethical Situation

Journal of Turkish Academic Novelty (tan) If you encounter unethical behavior or content other than the ethical responsibilities mentioned above, please turkishacademicnovelty@gmail.com Notify us via e-mail.

PUBLICATION POLICY

one. Studies submitted to the journal for publication must not have been published anywhere before, or have not been included in the evaluation process of another journal for publication, or have not been accepted for publication elsewhere.

2. Responsibility for the articles that are in the evaluation process and published belongs entirely to the author(s). Articles published in the magazineJournal of Turkish Academic Novelty (tan) does not reflect your opinion.

3. Journal of Turkish Academic Novelty (tan), has all publishing rights of the articles accepted and published for publication, in written and electronic media, without the need for any other process.

4. Articles written in Turkish and English are published in the magazine.

5.If the article or article on the subject of the research has been supported by any institution or produced from a thesis, this should be stated as a footnote on the same page by placing a (*) sign on the last word of the title of the work. In articles produced from the thesis, the person who wrote the thesis comes first in the list of authors.

6. Studies sent to the journal are subject to preliminary evaluation by the Editorial Board. Any form and content changes regarding the articles and writings that are pre-evaluated may be requested.

7.The Editor and the Editorial Board decide on the initiation of the peer review process. Manuscripts that pass the preliminary evaluation are examined by at least two referees.

8.Referees are faculty members with the title of professor, associate professor and doctor working at universities in Turkey. If deemed necessary by the Editorial Board, referees may be selected from among associate professors and professors working at universities abroad. If a faculty member who is an expert on the incoming manuscript cannot be found, PhD scientists who are experts on the subject can also be selected as referees.

9.The names of the authors and referees are kept confidential during the article evaluation process.

10.In line with the reports from the referees, it is decided to publish the articles or articles, to request corrections, additional information and abbreviations from the author(s) within the framework of the reports, or not to publish them, and the author(s) are notified.

11th. The author(s) are responsible for making all changes requested by the referees. Articles and articles cannot be printed without making the desired changes. The author(s) send a report containing the changes they have made to the journal along with the corrected article or articles.

12.An author cannot have more than one article published in the same issue or in two consecutive issues.

13.Manuscripts sent to the journal are not returned to the author(s).

14. Journal of Turkish Academic Novelty (tan)on this web page of (https://www.turkishacademicnovelty.com/Articles from new and previous issues are made available to researchers for social benefit.

15.This journal adopts the policy of providing open access. Published issues are made available for open access in accordance with this policy.

16. ournal of Turkish Academic Novelty (tan), to maintain the highest standards of publishing ethics Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)'s International Standards for Editors and Authors andICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors) observes its principles. For detailed information https://www.turkishacademicnovelty.com/ Please visit.

Journal of Turkish Academic Novelty

e-ISSN:3023-8390

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy